PoolRadar Comparison CNODE vs Top 100 Cardano Pools
PoolRadar Comparison CNODE vs the 100 Most Efficient Cardano Pools
- Ticker
- CNODE
- Pool Name
- CNODE Stake Pool
- Epoch
- 632
- Saturation
- 107.3%
- Margin
- 0.00%
- Active Stake
- 46.62M ₳
Data Epoch 632 2026-05-31 04:16
Yield Effect & Cost Analysis
₳
24.08 Bps Moderate Costs
(0.241% = 24.1 ₳/Jahr)📊 Based on 10 epochs of empirical data
✨ Efficiency Check (Bps)
The Bps value shows how much yield is lost through fees and oversaturation — based on your share of the pool.
If you change your stake, your share of fixed costs changes — and so does the Bps value.
- ● Low value = highly efficient, minimal fees and no oversaturation
- ● High value = fees or oversaturation eat into yield
Efficiency Benchmark (Bps): ● <15 │ ● <30 │ ● ≥30
1 Bps = 0.01% less yield │ 100 Bps = 1% less yield
⚠️ Pool CNODE at 107.3% saturated
PoolRadar Alerts for CNODE
Receive notifications when your pool's staking performance or saturation becomes critical.